# Curtain-wall panel to floor-edge reference report Status: application-owned source-bounded panel projection with independently reauthored synthetic context; no legal/process-isolation claim Package: `CWSE-RP-001@0.1.0` Engineering approval: no This replacement report was independently authored from the versioned synthetic machine artifacts in `examples/curtain-wall-slab/`. No private meeting note, transcript, alignment brief, retreat record, or deleted working document is a source for this text. The panel retains only explicitly source-linked YKK AP YCU 750 TU identity, 7.5-inch frame depth, 2.5-inch sightline, 1-inch-glass option, named anchor components, and source URLs; YKK AP did not author, authenticate, or endorse this projection. Configured panel geometry and project facts remain unresolved. Context products, connector candidates, demands, scores, placements, and results are invented for deterministic software testing. This report is not engineering approval, a manufacturer publication, a shop drawing, or permission to build. ## Question exercised by the fixture Can an application-authored, source-bounded panel projection and a synthetic floor-edge support declare a shared interface, receive explicit project context, screen several invented connector candidates, and emit reproducible results without turning a software check into an engineering claim? The machine package tests that question across three material branches and all nine scenario outcomes. It keeps product declarations, the interface contract, project assertions, evaluator rules, results, and receipts in separate versioned artifacts. ## Deterministic flow 1. A source-bounded panel projection and a synthetic substrate projection expose their declared identity, available envelope facts, interface roles, and product-local connection points. 2. A synthetic CIS projection declares complementary sides, three port datums, tolerances, and registered signatures. 3. A project-context sidecar supplies asserted placement, material, demand, access, fabrication, and review facts. 4. The evaluator checks schema and interface compatibility. 5. It checks the supplied simplified geometry assertions. 6. It evaluates nested connector-candidate applicability rules. 7. It applies deterministic hard gates only when their inputs exist. 8. It ranks only candidates that passed applicability and hard gates. 9. It writes one receipt per evaluator stage and leaves qualified review unresolved. Nine scenarios multiplied by seven stages produce 63 receipts. A stage that did not run receives `not_evaluated`; it never borrows a pass from an earlier stage. ## Geometry and authority boundary The package can show declared envelopes, port datums, a panel-side footprint, a substrate-side footprint, access zone, keep-out zone, penetration zone, and observed obstruction box. These are synthetic coordination primitives. The package does not yet materialize a candidate-to-product transform or a shared connection frame. Panel, substrate, and candidate remain in separate local frames. Review graphics therefore use ghosted component symbols and side-by-side diagrams instead of suggesting a fabrication-ready overlay. No bracket profile, plate thickness, fastener schedule, reinforcement, CLT layup, steel section, curtain-wall internal, or manufacturer model is supplied. ## Synthetic branch options ### Concrete slab edge - `CONN-CONCRETE-CAST-IN-CHANNEL` uses an invented 300 × 220 × 90 mm panel-side footprint and a 450 × 180 × 75 mm substrate-side zone. - `CONN-CONCRETE-POST-INSTALLED-ANGLE` represents an alternate shelf-angle path with asserted scan, access, edge-distance, and permission prerequisites. - Neither option performs breakout, pryout, reinforcement, cracked-concrete, fire, seismic, or facade calculations. ### CLT floor edge - `CONN-CLT-SCREW-ANGLE` uses an invented 320 × 220 × 95 mm panel-side footprint and a 420 × 260 × 160 mm substrate-side zone. - `CONN-CLT-CONCEALED-PLATE` represents an alternate routed-pocket path with asserted fabrication, layup, moisture, access, and permission prerequisites. - Neither option evaluates withdrawal, group action, rolling shear, charring, moisture, seismic, or facade performance. ### Steel frame and slab support - `CONN-STEEL-BOLTED-SHELF-ANGLE` uses an invented 330 × 230 × 100 mm panel-side footprint and a 400 × 260 × 90 mm substrate-side zone. - `CONN-STEEL-WELDED-PLATE` represents an alternate welded path with asserted procedure, access, inspection, coating-repair, and fire-protection prerequisites. - Neither option evaluates bolt, weld, member, slab-interaction, fire, seismic, or facade capacity. ## Outcome semantics - **Valid for coordination** means only that this synthetic evaluator received its declared inputs and its deterministic fixture rules passed. - **Invalid** means a named digital assertion fell outside a fixture threshold. - **Indeterminate** means a check ran but required input was absent or unresolved. - **Not evaluated** means the stage did not run because a prerequisite stage was not eligible. - **Qualified review required** is the terminal state for every branch because no professional engineering, fire, seismic, material, or facade adapter runs in this repository. The invalid scenarios deliberately preserve compatible interface identity while changing later geometry or screening assertions. The indeterminate scenarios preserve the interface and geometry checks while omitting material or authority facts. This prevents “same connector-family” from being misread as “this exact placement and connector are approved.” ## Selected end product in each valid branch The selected end product in each valid branch is a synthetic geometric coordination result: | Branch | Selected candidate | Invented placed offset (mm) | Remaining authority gap | | --- | --- | ---: | --- | | Concrete | `CONN-CONCRETE-CAST-IN-CHANNEL` | `[2, -1, 112]` | Concrete, reinforcement, demand, facade, fire, seismic, and structural review | | CLT | `CONN-CLT-SCREW-ANGLE` | `[1, 2, 118]` | Layup, fastener, moisture, facade, fire, seismic, and timber review | | Steel | `CONN-STEEL-BOLTED-SHELF-ANGLE` | `[-2, 1, 108]` | Member, bolt, hole, facade, fire, seismic, slab, and steel review | The selection is not a procurement recommendation, verified product, or installable detail. ## Artifact ownership | Information | Fixture location | | --- | --- | | Product identity, occupied envelope, face, and CIS declaration | Synthetic CTO projections | | Connection sides, port datums, tolerances, and signatures | Synthetic CIS projection | | Connector candidate geometry and rule trees | Application-owned synthetic catalog | | Placement, material, demand, access, and review assertions | Application-owned project-context sidecar | | Evaluation sequence and status meanings | Application-owned evaluator sidecar | | Findings, scores, selected geometry, and missing inputs | Application-owned result and receipt sidecars | | Qualified calculations, manufacturer approval, or construction authority | Not present | ## Reproduction checklist 1. Validate the package and referenced files against their declared schemas. 2. Resolve each exact product, interface, context, candidate, result, evidence, and receipt ID. 3. Confirm every scenario has seven stage-aligned receipts. 4. Confirm missing data remains `indeterminate` or `not_evaluated`. 5. Confirm selected geometry exists only for an eligible ranked candidate. 6. Confirm every public screen preserves the synthetic-data and authority boundary.